<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Evaluating returns to social media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thisisthegreenroom.com/2009/evaluating-returns-to-social-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thisisthegreenroom.com/2009/evaluating-returns-to-social-media/</link>
	<description>don&#8217;t panic</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:33:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: J</title>
		<link>http://www.thisisthegreenroom.com/2009/evaluating-returns-to-social-media/comment-page-1/#comment-1249</link>
		<dc:creator>J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 00:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thisisthegreenroom.com/?p=2205#comment-1249</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m actually not sure - won&#039;t the line that fits the equation ln(y) = a + bx + e be the same as that which minimizes y = a * exp(bx + e)? The former equation is the transformation of the latter into a linear space, and they are equivalent.

The distribution of the error has changed -- we&#039;d need them to be normally distributed in the linear case for standard regression assumptions to hold; therefore they&#039;d be exponentially distributed in the latter case and that regression should work as well. I think you&#039;d get the same coefficients in either case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm actually not sure - won't the line that fits the equation ln(y) = a + bx + e be the same as that which minimizes y = a * exp(bx + e)? The former equation is the transformation of the latter into a linear space, and they are equivalent.</p>
<p>The distribution of the error has changed -- we'd need them to be normally distributed in the linear case for standard regression assumptions to hold; therefore they'd be exponentially distributed in the latter case and that regression should work as well. I think you'd get the same coefficients in either case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Dwinnell</title>
		<link>http://www.thisisthegreenroom.com/2009/evaluating-returns-to-social-media/comment-page-1/#comment-1247</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Dwinnell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 11:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thisisthegreenroom.com/?p=2205#comment-1247</guid>
		<description>&quot;A linear regression of log-transformed data is the same as an exponential regression of the original data.&quot;

Strictly speaking, this is not true- at least not if both regressions minimize the squared error.  Though I think it will make little practical difference in this case, transforming the dependent variable effectively transforms the errors as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"A linear regression of log-transformed data is the same as an exponential regression of the original data."</p>
<p>Strictly speaking, this is not true- at least not if both regressions minimize the squared error.  Though I think it will make little practical difference in this case, transforming the dependent variable effectively transforms the errors as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J</title>
		<link>http://www.thisisthegreenroom.com/2009/evaluating-returns-to-social-media/comment-page-1/#comment-1244</link>
		<dc:creator>J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 12:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thisisthegreenroom.com/?p=2205#comment-1244</guid>
		<description>Thanks Ian, that pretty much sums it up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Ian, that pretty much sums it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Sohn</title>
		<link>http://www.thisisthegreenroom.com/2009/evaluating-returns-to-social-media/comment-page-1/#comment-1242</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Sohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 01:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thisisthegreenroom.com/?p=2205#comment-1242</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll give the shorter version of your post - there is simply no there there.  This is a self-serving piece of fluff.  

-Ian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'll give the shorter version of your post - there is simply no there there.  This is a self-serving piece of fluff.  </p>
<p>-Ian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R</title>
		<link>http://www.thisisthegreenroom.com/2009/evaluating-returns-to-social-media/comment-page-1/#comment-1241</link>
		<dc:creator>R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 16:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thisisthegreenroom.com/?p=2205#comment-1241</guid>
		<description>very cool... you have too much free time... as opposed to me who has no free time...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very cool... you have too much free time... as opposed to me who has no free time...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

