Get out your tin foil hats, there's something sinister afoot!
Zero Hedge, a blog which has been getting an astounding amount of press lately (in particular because of this rumor) posted the following picture this afternoon "without commentary" (please note I recreated their image to use EST times):
This is called a volume-at-price chart, or a histogram in which each bar represents number of trades at that price (prices are listed on the x-axis), in this case for the S&P 500. You may recall that at the end of the day the market quickly rallied from being slightly down to close at the day's high of 851.92. Zero Hedge's glass is always half hidden behind a conspiracy novel, and the implication here is that the spike is caused by heavy-volume market-manipulating fiends, aiming to mask... something evil (it's unclear what exactly, as you'll recall the post was "without commentary"). To drive the point home, ZH also posted an image of the SPY (the tradeable S&P 500 proxy) which, notably, did not exhibit such a spike.
At this point, level heads need to prevail. Here is the exact same graph, but only including trades made at or before the close of trading at 4:00:
Obviously, the conspiracy-driving spike is absent. Why? Here's Bloomberg's view of the S&P 500 over the course of the day, from half an hour before the open to half an hour after the last datapoint arrived:
Yes, the datastream continues after the close! In fact, there is one after hours tick every 15 seconds from 4:00 to 5:00, a grand total of 240 "trades" (there aren't really S&P 500 trades, only ticks) at the closing price, after the close. The key point is that these extraneous ticks are, for some reason, included in the VaP histograph if it is not limited to trades before the close. When Zero Hedge took their picture, 39 minutes had elapsed since the close, or 156 extra ticks. Unsurprinsingly, the height of the "conspiracy bar" is exactly 156. Had ZH waited until 5:00, they would have seen the mystery spike grow to 240. I know this because it's true.
So there's no conspiracy here, only a lagging data feed and a misspecified screen. Here's the same comparison for yesterday, first as it appeared at 4:00 (click to zoom if you so desire):
In fact, this phenomenon happens every single day. There's no conspiracy revealed by this data. In fact, it happens on every index Bloomberg tracks. However, it does not occur for actual equity tickers like SPY; presumably Bloomberg's software distinguishes between securities which actually trade (and thus have actual "after hours trades") and those that are merely composites, ticking across until the data feed ends.
The first rule of statistics is to know your data. You may now put your tin foil hats away.